Palo alto lacp cisco suspended. Additional Information.

Palo alto lacp cisco suspended Meaning that I do expect the passive firewall to speak (transmit) as it has been spoken to by active firewall. I have one vPC connecting the two 5510's to the 7010. Passive Link state set to auto. 13c4. Palo Alto calls it “Aggregate Interface Group” while Cisco calls With CSCtn96950, by default, standalone mode is enabled. 1ax or 802. Cisco: interface Port-channel2 switchport access vlan 254 switchport mode access. When one of the interface become suspended, we use ICMP or remote access to this switch will fail , but By default, LACP sets a port to suspended state if it does not receive an LACP PDU from the peer. Hi, I am designing ACI connectivity to Palo Alto firewall in Active/Standby mode. But then a ping from a host connecte. First link comes up and bundles, but I get this on the second one: Jan 5 13:04:34 PST: %EC-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2: Gi2/0/51 is not compatible with Gi1/0/51 and will be suspended (vlan mask is different) But the p Hi ALL I have two Cisco 9300X-24Y-E stacked switches. Hi @VPenkivskyi,. 9 MB) PDF - This Chapter (1. The 40G links are bundled in AE1 with LACP enabled. New here? Get started with these tips. The issue was that when a couple of storage nodes are setup in a HA cluster and you manually failover (say node B), then B will not send any LACP traffic over the bundled links. I'm trying to setup a layer 2 port channel between my Nexus 9Ks and the Palo Firewall for vlan 200 traffic only. Thus, a firewall in Passive or Non-functional HA state can communicate Palo Alto - LACP konfigurace 13. It down and hover the mouse on it show below info: ethernet1/2: I would configure LACP active on PA as well as Cisco side. Selection state Selected 2015/03/08 19:55:45 critical lacp ethern lacp-up 0 LACP interface ethernet1/2 moved into AE-group ae1. Cheaper models (< AP220) don’t do LACP and only have STP for redundancy. Create an Aggregate group with 2 interfaces. The same config is now put into a 3650, same scenario, and the ports goes into s - suspended state. 0(2)SE2 with a 4 port port-channel, simple trunk configuration and LACP. If the enclosure switches to the interconnect bay Hi, I have two 4500-X on which I want to activate an LACP : interface Port-channel3 switchport switchport mode trunk ! interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1/14 switchport mode trunk channel-protocol lacp channel-group 3 mode passive OR active end TenGigabitEthernet1/1/14 is up, line protocol is down (susp If a firewall uses LACP or LLDP, negotiation of those protocols upon failover prevents sub-second failover. In V-wire if the Links are aggregated then the firewall could forward the packets to the other ports in AE , that will cause the LACP to not come between peers. Getting Started. In switch-1 two ports and Switch-2 two ports are bundled by LACP. I noticed the firewall LACP rates on the firewall, ethernet1/1 & ethernet1/2 are both setup for fast, while it thinks is partner has a slow rate. The Palo Alto firewall pair must also have up to date application, url, and threat databases. I am trying to configure LACP between PA 3020 Active / Passive and cisco switch. 1. it always seems to be the second one that is plugged in. 1. HA Group 1: Moved from state Passive to state Suspended 2023/09/23 08:40:29: djc-palo2 reports critical lacp event: LACP interface ethernet1/21 moved out of AE-group ae1. In Active / Standby. So if one ISP fails the default Hey there - been staring at this for a while and just can't see why one of my interfaces won't come up in an LACP aggregate. The reason why we get the message "LACP currently no enabled on the remote port " is because LACP is not enabled on the member ports. 2(55)SE1). The product comparison indicates that it Solved: Recently started upgrading our 3850's to 16. Location. Palo Alto Firewall. IEEE 802. In this configuration, if Cisco 3750-E stack running 15. I am able to send traffic across these links but they are clearly not functioning as aggregated interfaces as i loose pack Testing a PA-220. When I do a show ip OSPF neighbor I see the checkpoint, when we Hi everyone, I'm trying to set-up a Subinterface on a Aggregate group with LACP on a PA-3020 and a DELL 6248 switch in a test envoirment. html was invaluable when I was trying to understand the interaction of PA LACP with Cisco switches. 2. on the inside. When the tunnel connects, it seems to run fine. 6 and now seeing OSPF failures every 2-4 days. I then connect the 2 GB interfaces from FW01 and 2 GB from FW02 down to a cisco switch in VSS cluster. With LACP disabled we have a 1 ping loss during fail-over events. If this is feasible, this configuration is supported in Palo Alto. That is I have a PA440 in a HA config (active/passive) on FW 10. 2). Good Day everyone, I am fairly good at configuring Cisco but this I cannot get working. After enable LACP. All the switch ports that the firewalls are connected to have portfast enabled. 0. Servers using 'teamed' nics, (LACP) can fail if the switch is rebooted because the server fails to respond to LACP BPDUs. The debug of LACP shows clearly this: * May 31 21: 26: 11. Does anyone know what would cause a Nexus port-channel (vpc) to be in suspected mode against Cisco FirePOWER 2110 series appliance? The interface status shows that for the port-channel shows that it is in suspected mode (with no LACP PDUs). " If both sides are Cisco devices, PAGP (Cisco proprietary) and LACP are both supported. We have a need to secure a localized VLAN behind the Palo Alto's. On the Cisco log I see Gi2/0/5 suspended: LACP currently not enabled on the remote port. Selection state Unselected(Link down) Now when this config is used in a 3560X and the end device is on standby (not communicating LACP) the ports goes into I - stand-alone state. 0 Helpful Reply. About 30 seconds after enabling LAcP on the access switch I lost connectivity with ALL switches (I lost access to our entire network). Leveraging Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Secure Internet Gateway (SIG) templates, the implementation process becomes efficient and I connected two Nexus 7K switches. Additional Information. I have two link in the group and have configured L3 sub interfaces to seperate VLANs. When we do this on switch it will generate one system ID which would be virtual and will use it for lacp negotiation ( it will not use physical system ID since it will be two in numbers and each Troubleshooting LACP going down or flap issue Environment. %ETC-5 This is what I am getting Port-channel12 is up, line protocol is up (connected) Hardware is EtherChannel, address is 0024. I''m encountering this issue, when i boot all the stackwise at the same time the LAG work proprely, but if the only standby We don't have physical acces to the firewall and the switch at this moment. I am looking for a cabling recommendation diagram for LACP portchannels from Cisco Switch Stacks or Nexus to HA Palo Alto Pair. Randomly the adjacency will fail after the Palo is not seeing 4 hello. With no configuration changes on the vSphere host or vDS, but going in and changing switch interfaces or trying to trunk the ports, sometimes the other 2 will be the P and the ones that were previously working are now suspended. When I try channel-group 2 mode on without channel-protocol lacp the links come active (green), but LACP is not negotiated or sensed on the link. However, all are welcome to join and help each other on a journey to a more secure tomorrow. No new traffic sessions will be accepted until disk space is freed up; Minimum Retention Period (<num> days) Violated for segnum:<num> type:<name> Dear community, I have a LACP Portchannel configured on a Catalyst connected to a Nexus vPC. Checked the logs on both switches and Good morning OyeSlacker--I am thinking that you might have misconfigured something when you were trying to set speed and/or duplex. Sound like LACP is not working with PAN and we had to set PaGP, which, on the other hand, cannot be configured to aggregate interfaces of different Catalyst switches, even if configured as a single virtual switch (i. lacp suspend-individual is a default configuration on Cisco Nexus 9000 series switches. A port in passive mode will generally not transmit LACP messages unless its partner is in the active mode; that is, it will not speak unless spoken to. This is my configuration interface Port-channel12 description SERVER Gi1/0/12_Gi2/0/12 switchport access v We have an HA A/P PA-7050 cluster running 7. Palo Alto Firewalls in High Availability HA configuration. Is this the Working on a 5430 with 10. And it connected to the company network. Solved: Hello all, We have a customer who is trying to create a 2 gig ports Port-Channel with our router and the LACP is not working. Solved: Ive created two port-channel groups and one of them won't work It keeps showing that they are not-in-bndl and sometimes there are other erros. Introduction. Today's task was get LACP working on a Palo Alto, so traffic and fault tolerance could be spread across multiple members of a Cisco 3750X switch stack. This weekend I started changing the etherchannel inks to LAcP. I - stand-alone s - suspended. I have added 2 interfaces to the AE Group on each FW. Also seeing this on the not that gets suspended: critical lacp ethern link-do 0 LACP interface ethernet1/1 moved out of AE-group ae1. I started with on port on one member of a stack of 2960's. Does this mean that LACP In suspended state, communications still happen between the firewalls in the HA pair and this is not the same as disabling HA. For this scenario, assume a simple setup. Passive link state is auto and the physical interfaces are up on the replica but AE interfaces are down, and on the switch that is communicating with the passive it is suspended. I have tried setting the I have a pair of Palo Alto firewalls in Active/Standby mode connected to legacy 6500 switches. log during the timestamp of the issue gathered from step 1. 2(25)SEC and later. On a virtual wire, the Palo Alto Networks firewall can pass Cisco LACP traffic only when the links are not aggregated on the firewall. Includes design and deployment considerations for centralized management, resource monitoring, and advanced logging capabilities. The default settings on the Palo Alto surprised me a bit, as I was expecting it to default to active and enable fast timers, but this was easy They are connected to a Ubuntu (linux) box with LACP enalbled. It may still be forwarding traffic. I have created a portchannel on the Cisco switch and put the 2 ports from the Active Palo and 2 ports from the Passive Palo into the same channel When I add the line channel-protocol lacp there is no change, still suspended with amber LEDs. *Feb 17 I am trying to configure LACP between PA 3020 Active / Passive and cisco switch. I am also seeing a Suspended interface on one of the ports. Then it takes 20-30 minutes for the adjacency to come back. Changed the LACP transmission rate to slow, and restarted both the firewall and the switch. log when make FW2 functional: Resolution. As the device If it's simply suspended from the LAG and running as a dynamic LAG i. 1 and haven't change since (at least from what I know). I encountered the same issue in connecting PA5220 to Cisco Nexus 9508 N9K-X9636PQ line card with Palo Alto + Cisco QSFP-40G-SR-BD transceivers. PAN-OS 7. Discover and save your favorite ideas. 17 Please see below: LACP: - 310666 This website uses Cookies. Mon Feb 06 20:40:02 UTC 2023. Expand all | Collapse all. This will result in a loss of connection to the server. * May 31 21: 26: 11. After the configurations and the interconnection of the switches, the port-channel goes into "suspended" mode. PA-Rack-9500(config-if)#exit I am trying to configure LACP between PA 3020 Active / Passive and cisco switch. Just have few queries - 1. we are running 2 pa-3320 in Ha Actiave/passive mode both of which have aggregated ports. Aggregate Interfaces and LACP. the core VSS I have 5 etherchannels configured in variouse configuration some are "on" some are desirable and LACP. This may not seems to be a big issue, until I try to send WOL to the end device. Any else seeing The process will continue until the primary device moves into a suspended state (3 times by default). In the older switch (C3560X) the physical links would remain active in standalone (individual) state. tldr: Yes this is expected and perfectly fine, since the passive firewall is dropping all incoming packets to it's ports the Cisco will move the ports into a suspended state. These will connect to a stack of Cisco C9300s. Palo Alto Firewalls; Supported PAN-OS; High Availability Active/Passive; LACP pre-negotiation enabled. LACP allows Cisco switches to manage Ethernet channels between switches that conform to the 802. One of the 2 ports in the bundle always goes in to suspended. 0(2)SE8, attempting to bring up port channel to 2921 router. On a virtual wire, if the links are aggregated, then the firewall could forward the packets to the wrong port in Aggregated Ethernet, which will cause LACP not to function between peers. First, h hi, I am facing this same issue, i had configured 3 links between 6509 to vmware server. When looking at ether channel status, we see 3 ports are in correct state (P), but the fourth one is in suspended mode (s) and we can't understand why. Also assume the firewalls are in active/passive. 001: % EC-5-L3DONTBNDL2: Gi0 / 2 suspended: LACP currently not enabled on the remote port. 4. As per RFC: If devices have different transmission rates, each uses the rate of its peer. 3ad protocol. Each peer must have a unique LACP System ID in an active/active deployment (Network Interface Ethernet Add Aggregate Group System Priority). Thank you all for your help. the two switches were connected through an ether channel (2 ports on each switch) in active mode. after reconnecting everything in the correct order, the passive unit can't You can also configure EtherChannels manually. ACI has a L2 link to 6500 switch with an SVI running EIGRP and advertising all networks to 6500. 08. 0) and a Cisco switch (model WS-C3750G-24T (IOS: 12. Hello Dear Forum. The LACP settings we have are the Cisco + Splunk: It’s a new day for your data. Pavel We are setting up 2 nx 9k switches with port channel (LACP) enabled so we can have multiple links for redundancy. e. 2021 | Tag Palo Alto. 021: % EC-5-L3DONTBNDL2: Gi0 / 3 suspended: LACP currently not enabled on the This subreddit is for those that administer, support or want to learn more about Palo Alto Networks firewalls. If a firewall uses LACP or LLDP, negotiation of those protocols upon failover prevents sub-second failover. I have created a portchannel on the Cisco switch and put the 2 ports from the Active Palo and 2 ports from the Passive Palo into the same channel I have a pair of Nexus9000 93180YC-EX configure with vPC and each Nexus 9k is connected to a Nexus 2k I notice my interface port channel is in (suspended(no LACP PDUs)) SW-1# show lacp interface eth1/1 Interface Ethernet1/1 is suspended Channel group is 101 port channel is Po101 PDUs sent: 154 PDU Symptom The Firewall is configured for Link Aggregation using LACP as the bundling protocol Please see HOW TO CONFIGURE LACP for assistance in configuring LACP. Enterprise Networking -- Routers, switches, wireless, and firewalls. Nexus can obviously use vPC feature so it may be slightly different than a switch stack. 5, I have configured with HA in A/P. We have worked with TAC but can't seem to PA FW 1 (the active one) has port 5 and 6 connected to Gi1/0/5 and Gi2/0/5 on the Cisco side. (Make sure both links are in LACP active mode to force the messages) A couple things: 1. We have checked everything, change the switch interface to make it accept non supported transceivers, change the fiber cables, swap the ports, hard coded speed and duplex setting, remove LACP, remove dot1q In Virtual Wire mode, the Palo Alto Networks device can pass Cisco Link Aggregation Control Protocol traffic in vwire only when the links are not aggregated on the PAN-fw. It is I have config LACP between PA3400 and Cisco Switch everything work fine implement test on standalone mode Cisco eth1/1 (po1) PA eth1/1 (ae1) - 543937 This website uses Cookies. While creating the Port channel I have tried different modes of LACP on both Cisco and Palo Alto side but never can get both ports on Cisco to be bundled or green sign on AE bundle on Palo Alto. I bundled the aggregate links, To perform failover test, one of the firewalls was suspended; Failover was successful, but when making the suspended firewall functional again, it is stuck in Initial (Leaving suspended state) Firewall FW1: Active Firewall FW2: Initial (Leaving suspended state) Firewall FW1: Firewall FW2: Firewall FW2 ha_agent. Is there any white paper regarding the connectivity to the active/standby firewall without L4 to L7 integ Solved: Hello Everyone I am trying to build out a LACP Etherchannel between a Dell R540 and a Cisco 2960XR. 1, LACP (Link Aggregation Control Protocol, 802. "LACP is supported on cross-stack EtherChannels from Cisco IOS Software Release 12. I've checked the individual port settings one by one and they all look the same to me. Securing Applications in a Cisco ACI Data Center: Design Guide. 085 +0400 Got port 82 event, link 0, speed 4, duplex 2 When a firewall leaves suspended state, it goes into tentative state for the Tentative Hold Time after links are up and able to process incoming packets. PDF - Complete Book (50. Hello, Can I create an LACP etherchannel between two cisco stack. By clicking Accept, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance your community and translation I tried config LACP on two switch Layer 3 by Pnetlab as below: but it just show error: *Feb 17 08:09:55. The Cisco switch interface for one of the FW pairs is Solved: Hi All, PA-3060, PAN-OS 7. 248c) Description: MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 0/255 Encapsulation ARPA, loopbac This is slightly different from device going to suspended state due to non-functional loop. Switch interfaces exchange LACP packets only with partner interfaces with the active or passive mode configuration. Please give a suggestion to solve this. 10-h5 connected to a 9200 Cisco stack with a LACP configured between them. Note that the cisco 9300 switch does not allow me to t Traffic and logging suspended due to unexported logs; Traffic and logging are suspended since traffic-stop-on-logdb-full feature has been enabled; Audit storage for <name> logs is full. 391: %EC-5-L3DONTBNDL2: Et0/1 suspended: LACP currently not enabled on the remote port. Documentation Home; Palo Alto Networks; Support; Live Community; Knowledge Base; PAN-OS OpenConfig Administrator’s Guide: LACP. Moved from state Active to state Suspended critical lacp ethern link-do 0 LACP interface ethernet1/5 moved out of AE-group ae1. The aggregate interface can up when LACP is not enable. We are I am attempting to configure two ports for LACP and I am only seeing one interface as member under the PortChannel that I created. like so: EVPRODIDF05#sh ether sum. My concern is, can I enable LACP on Palo Alto side and make it a routed interface and assign IP to it and on the nexus side they will configure a VPC, make it a L3 and configured an IP on it so on the Palo Alto side, it appears only as 1 I'm experiencing an issue with a setup of aggregated ethernet interfaces configured with LACP simply for redundancy connections between our HA Active/Passive firewalls and Cisco ISR 4451 routers. Flap-Max Timer Setting The flap-max is the number of times a device is We have cisco WS-C2960L-24TS-LL (Version:152-6. Switch stack cabling currently: Cisco SW#1 - Port gi1/0/1 ---> PA3050 (Active) Secure Access - Palo Alto. 1Q trunk links. This is to the physical links in Po3 to the Passive Palo Alto Firewall: Oct 19 2023 15:43:16 EDT: %ETC-5-L3DONTBNDL2: Twe2/0/3 suspended: LACP currently not enabled on the remote port. Download PDF. Members Online. Solution 1: LACP sets a port to the suspended state if it does not receive an LACP bridge protocol data unit (BPDU) from Hello ALL, can anyone let me know what the reason that some interfaces show that are in suspended state when using the sh etherchannel summary command. However, when I change channel-group 1 to "active" (making it LACP) the links go into Suspended mode because they are not receiving LACP BPDUs from the passive IPS. Can someone look at one side of my config and see if I have an issue on it? I'll try to get the If a firewall uses LACP or LLDP, negotiation of those protocols upon failover prevents sub-second failover. The Cisco switches do not support VPC. 0(3)I7(9) with Hello, Palo1(Active)(Inside seg) >>>(L2? L3-p2p?)7K1(VPC) Palo2(Passive)(Inside seg) >>> (L2? L3-p2p?)7K2(VPC) How should this be done in order to maintain redundancy? Create a new SVI and VPC for the inside firewall segment, then I would configure LACP active on PA as well as Cisco side. will it be possible to create vPC to each Firewall and have an L3Out to each? 2. I have created a portchannel on the Cisco switch and put the 2 ports from the Active Palo and 2 ports from the Passive Palo into the same channel Hi, i have configured a multicassis etherchannel between some catalyst 2960x and two C9500-x configured in stackwise virtual. Device is in HA "suspended" state. configuration below. Chapter Title. And I know it works on Palo Alto as other AS bundle is up. Most probably one interface from aggregate group is connected to one switch and other to 2nd switch and both the physical switches are virtually clustered into one. I was able to find out that the PA-200 does not support aggregating interfaces with LACP, but the PA-220 is rather new and I have not been able to find a definitive statement about it. Have a look at this link This VPC has been working for years, but yesterday one link goes down for a LACP issue: NexusA# show lacp interface Eth9/5 Interface Ethernet9/5 is suspended Channel group is 320 port channel is Po320 PDUs sent: 2644275 PDUs rcvd: 2854056 Markers sent: 0 Markers rcvd: 0 Marker response sent: 0 Marker response rcvd: 0 Unknown packets rcvd: 0 Overview. Cisco, Juniper, Arista, Fortinet, and more are welcome. the port channel is up but two of the member interfaces are showing up/down. Contents. We are not officially supported by Palo Alto Networks or any of its employees. This command puts the port in suspended state if it does not receive any LACP PDUs. Topology example Link Aggregation methods other than LACP for Nexus 7706 The customer has Palo Alto Firewalls that have to connect to a Nexus 7K (7706). Supported PAN-OS; The individual nodes are configured with a priority value 2015/03/08 19:55:44 critical lacp ethern nego-fa 0 LACP interface ethernet1/2 moved out of AE-group ae1. among the 3 ports only one port is in use and the remaining 2 ports are going to suspended state. The vendor has said that a passive IPS will not send these LACP BPDUs. V článku chci ukázat, jak něco takového nastavit mezi Palo Alto boxem a Cisco switchem. The ports have the following config: Turn off LACP on Palo Alto, using "mode on" on Cisco, and Passive Link State set to Auto instead of Shutdown on Palo Alto, fail over time is about 10 seconds. When we disable the preemption, this does not happen, and failovering worked perfectly through different scenarios. I cannot get them out of it. We noticed during testing that LACP causes 8-10 ping loss during a fail-over event. Thank you @OtakarKlier and @MP18 for the replys,. Pavel Before high availability can be enabled on the Palo Alto firewall pair, both firewalls need to be the same hardware model. Thus, a firewall in Passive or Non-functional HA state can communicate Solved: Hi Just wondering if anyone here has successfully gotten LACP to work on a PA-800 series FW (set to passive) and Cisco Switch (set - 288074 This website uses Cookies. There were no software changes last period. It is Active/Passive on the firewalls but LACP is Active on all components (PA HA and Switches). Solved: Hello, I will define a Port-Channel Interface in mode LACP, in a Switch Catalyst 3850: ! interface Port-channel4 switchport mode access end To this port-channel interface, I associate two interfaces: ! interface GigabitEthernet1/0/4 For PAN-OS versions 8. I am Hello All, I have two cisco 9200 switches connected back to back. With our validated design and deployment guidance, you can reduce rollout time and avoid common integration challenges. We have default VLAN1 which is Learn how to enable the best security outcomes by using Palo Alto Networks solutions. The firewall uses the LACP Port Priority of each interface you assign (Step 3) to determine which interfaces are initially active and to determine the order in which standby I have two VSS 6500 installations one set of 6503 as core router/switch and a pair of 6509 as collasped distribution. H - Hot-standby (LACP only) R - Layer3 S - Layer2 I am not using LACP on the switch -- each firewall has one connection to one switch for each of the three VLANs. Also, having a static route on L2 directly pointed towards the SVI IP on 6500 as a next hop address. However, you can enable an interface on a passive firewall to negotiate LACP and LLDP prior to failover. 3ad) was not supported. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more. I have created a portchannel on the Cisco switch and put the 2 ports from the Active Palo and 2 ports from the Passive Palo into the same channel Our security department is switching from a Checkpoint configuration to a Palo Alto firewall. Book Title. We are having a problem setting up a port channel/aggregated ethernet interface using two 1 gig connections between our Palo Alto (model 5020, PAN-OS 8. Usually if a link is suspended it has not received a LACP message from its peer on that link. LACP. Agregace linek je skvělá pro zajištění redundance. Selection state Unselected(Link down) l2ctrld. First of all, if I'm not mistaken, the default setting for speed and duplex are auto-negotiate. 1 the Palo Alto Networks firewall supports LACP, the Link Aggregation Control Protocol which bundles physical links to a logical channel. I want to implement etherchannel between my cisco switches with an avaya switch. Flags: D - down P - in port-channel. Once the As described in "LACP and LLDP Pre-Negotiation for Active/Passive HA", LACP pre-negotiation will pre-negotiate LACP in HA passive or Non-Functional state. 3ad)? Hi guys, Its been a while but can anyone tell me if they see any issues with the following design i have come up with. I have a v I've tried a number of things and every which way I can't get the other 2 interfaces to no be in suspended mode. By clicking Accept, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance your community and translation experience. Consider the below setup, each firewall has one physical link to separate switch members of the stack. I'm including a diagram to show a simulation of what we're looking to do. This is the first time I've dealt with them. Before making the node functional, consider the following recommendations : Investigate and the fix the issue of the interface and/or path monitoring flaps. Pokud jedna linka odpadne, velmi rychle ji zastoupí další. ASA on our side Palo Alto on theirs. Provides design guidance for using Palo Alto Networks firewalls to secure applications deployed in Cisco ACI. Reading Also on the Cisco router the portchannel towards the passive firewall goes into a suspended state since it detects that LACP is not enabled on the remote port. Palo Alto Firewall; LACP Configured; Procedure. Environment. The FirePOWER is r We have a 4 member port channel setup. Cisco VSS configuration for Solved: Hello Experts! I'm setting up a new vpn tunnel to a partner. Selection state Unselected(Link down) info port ethern link-ch 0 Port ethernet1/2: MAC Down critical lacp ethern link-do 0 LACP interface ethernet1/2 moved out of AE-group ae1. comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment spann0r /12/all-sorts-of-things-about-lacp-and-lags. VLAN Interface IP Address All VLAN interface configuration settings sync except for the IP address ( Network Interface VLAN ). The data traffic is highly effected with the failovering and spanning-tree recalculations on the Cisco switches. 1 and above. If the number of interfaces you assign to the group exceeds the Max Ports, the remaining interfaces will be in standby mode. LACP (Link Aggregation Control Protocol) configured. 2 with QNPC (40G). 3ad defines LACP. PA FW 1 (the active one) has port 5 and 6 connected When no response is received from an LACP peer, ports in the port channel are moved to suspended state. This document describes how to troubleshoot Link suspended trunk auto auto 10Gbase-SR sh int e1/1 Ethernet1/1 is down (suspended(no LACP PDUs)) admin state is up, Dedicated Interface Belongs to Po1 Hardware: 100/1000/10000/25000 Ethernet Hi @Chango ,. I'm trying to LACP trunk a pair of Nexus3000 C3064PQ Chassis running 7. Can someone indicate why my ethernet ports are in suspended state for some reason, i need an indication why this may be and what i can do to fix this issue. Configure Cisco nexus switch NXOS02 with an LACP priority of 16384 so that it is the preferred device for managing the Hello, We have setup a LACP port between a Synology NAS & a Stack of 2 Cisco 2960x switches. We run OSPF between our cisco routers and the checkpoint today. When no response is received from an LACP peer, ports in the port channel are moved to suspended state. About PAN-OS Hi, I am trying to get an aggregation link up between a Cisco and PA-4050 switch (v3. if i remove the cable from cisco switch which is in use, Before PAN-OS 6. Reply reply A weird issue moving a server from a 6509 to a Nexus has made me look at the LACP suspend-individual command. Does the channel group need to be the Please forgive my ignorance, when it comes to Palo Alto's. It is between a Cisco ASA and a Nexus. However, should the tunnel go down, it will not come back up unless they initiate the traffic. Resolution. Currently we have a pair of PA-3060 running 6. This subreddit is for those that administer, support or want to learn more about Palo Alto Networks firewalls. 248c (bia 0024. There are two ISP's at my site which are plugged into two Palo Alto firewalls in Active/Passive mode. Post Reply Learn, share, save. Since PAN-OS version 6. When we force the mode ON on both sides of the port-channel it works and we have connectivity but as soon as we Configure all Cisco Nexus port channels as 802. I will have an LACP port-channel connecting one port of each Cisco switch (ports g1/0/1 and g2/0/1 I have two 10G ports on a Cisco Catalyst 3750X connected to two ports on a HP c7000 Blade Enclosure (te1/1/1 & te1/1/2 connected to two separate interconnect bays). ADMIN MOD LACP from PA-3050 to Cisco Nexus 9K . Everytime I build out a Port Channel interface, the ports stay in a suspended state. 2 MB) View with Adobe Reader on a variety of devices Hello ACI Gurus. I will have two PA-440s in Active/Passive High Availability mode. Create VLAN 10 on all switches. " This is the HP switch. Some of my first concerns: Standard Cisco LACP is mostly configured unconditional, which means the ports don’t come up if LACP isn’t detected on the link. I am currently migrating a two sets of Palo Alto Physical firewalls directly counted to old Cisco 6509 switches to ACI. 10 in active/passive. We lost power to both switches and all the ports in the ether channel went into suspend status. Both devices have LACP bundles towards a Cisco router. In summary: to validate if it is possible to build a port-channel from Palo Alto, against a switch-stack (2 switches) pointing a connection to switch 01 of the stack and another interface to switch 02 of the stack. This is achieved through the implementation of multiple security methods and layers, Hi, Are the core switches in VSS mode or standalone? What type of switches are they? The Portchannel will distribute traffic based on the hashing algorithm configured and sends the traffic through multiple physical links. Using AP225 APs, I found I had LACP at my disposal. By clicking Accept, you agree to the To make a device move back from suspended state refer:How to Recover HA Pair Member from the Suspended State. Filter Version. Cases are opened with both Palo Alto and Cisco. This Knowledge Article will show us how to resolve an improperly configured Link Aggregation configuration case where misconfiguration on local or peer device shows the AE interface to Cisco recommends that you have knowledge of these topics: • Catalyst 9000 Series Switches Architecture • Cisco IOS® XE Software Architecture %ETC-5-L3DONTBNDL2: Gig1/0/1 suspended: LACP currently not enabled on the remote port. It also safeguards the connection from the network to the internet. Focus. I've got a Palo Alto FW HA Active/Passive pair, connected to two different Cisco switches (one for Edge traffic, the other as a DMZ switch). During testing, if request high-availability state suspend, the data ports got disabled. I have a working port channel on a 3750x 3 switch stack running version 15. That´s expected, as the port doesnt receiev any lacp pdus anymore. On the other side is not a Cisco switch but a PAlo Alto firewall and all interfaces on that end are configured correctly to be in the same aggregated link. When I am applying that LACP in ports, one of that port is going to suspended State. Deployment Guides. I'm wondering what steps to take as regards packet captures on firewall interfaces to figure out why negotiation will fail. Are there other spanning tree related configurations to check on a Cisco switch when set for portfast? Thanks Hi, I would just like to verify the normal behavior of LACP in an Active/Passive HA setting. x & above, the following Palo Alto Networks firewalls support LACP: PA-400, PA-500, PA-800, PA-3000 Series, PA-3200 Series, PA-3400 Seri How to Configure LACP 262674 Palo Alto Firewalls; Supported PAN-OS; High Availability Active/Passive; LACP pre-negotiation enabled. recently we've moved our server room to a different room and have reconfigured some of out network components. PAgP is a Cisco-proprietary protocol that you can only run on Cisco switches and on those switches that licensed vendors license to support PAgP. Updated on . 1 . This is probably an LACP negotiation problem. Selection state Selected 2023/09/23 08:40:29: djc-palo2 reports critical lacp event: LACP interface ethernet1/22 moved out of AE-group ae1. LACP support was introduced in verion 6. E) and use two interface config port-channel use LACP mode . Check the system logs with filter set to (subtype eq lacp) under UI: Monitor > Logs > System show log system direction equal backward subtype equal lacp; Check the l2ctrld. Thanks Jean Hi All I have 2 x Palo Alto 3020 FW's. So this document is still valid. If I assign an IP on the default VLAN to the Aggregate Group everything works but I can't seem to get the Subinterface to work, I've tested a Subinterface on a standard interface which also worked. Was this guy for real? Network security engineer Here we have a CP6200p NGFW, i set a bond group to connect with Cisco switch, below is the configurations on both Checkpoint & Cisco side. Both interfaces connect to an unmanaged D-Link switch. Their suggestion was to use LAcP on the cross stacked etherchannel links. Need to create an Aggregate group and add 2 x GB interfaces to the Aggregate Group. Kind Regards. Reading the documentation, Cisco says its possible to have Ggabit Etherchannels on 10 Gigabit interfaces. Which means if all interfaces in the group have equal priority firewall will use the last three bits from the session ID Getting started with LACP using PAN-OS OpenConfig plugin. When I shutdown one Port of the vPC the connected port on the catalyst goes into lacp suspended state. Oct 19 2023 15:43:16 EDT: %ETC-5-L3DONTBNDL2: Twe1/0/3 suspended: LACP currently not enabled on the remote port. I have a 7010 which i'm using to connect to two 5510's. When interfaces on a Cisco 3750 are configured as part of a port-group using LACP (passive) what are the timers or delays associated with putting one of the ports into "suspend"? What is required to get a port out of "suspend"? Here is the scenario we saw prompting me to ask this question. Aggregate interfaces that are not running LACP should be defined on the connected devices to firewall. Tentative Hold Time range (sec) can be disabled (which is 0 seconds) or in the range 10-600; default is 60. log file below . 3. The Palo Alto devices do not support LACP, therefore I wanted to know if either PaGP or any other Link Aggregation specification will work between the N7Ks and the Palo Alto devices other than LACP (possibly 802. For example, on Cisco switches, the port channel mode for the aggregate interfaces should be set to "On. Cisco has designed Secure Access to protect and provide access to private applications, both on-premise and cloud-based. ) Suspended just means it couldn't be bundled with the LACP port channel for some reason. 2020-04-12 00:19:25. The Palo Alto takes over the same IP address and has the ospf password. Thus, a firewall in Passive or Non-functional HA state can communicate LACP configure between PA and cisco switch . Firepower Management Center Configuration Guide, Version 6. The PAN-OS version must be the same, except when there is a temporary version mismatch during a software upgrade. Two firewalls in HA and two switches in a stack. I would also recommend to enable the LACP pre-negotiation LACP and LLDP Pre-Negotiation for Active/Passive HA by selecting check box under: LACP > High Availability Options > Enable in HA Passive State. On the active firewall the LACP negotiates properly but on the passive firewal Enter the Max Ports (number of interfaces) that are active (1 to 8) in the aggregate group. Does this mean that LACP passive mode ports will become disabled (suspended) unless the neighbor device is explicitly configured with LACP I have tried different modes of LACP on both Cisco and Palo Alto side but never can get both ports on Cisco to be bundled or green sign on AE bundle on Palo Alto. , using channel-group <group> mode active, it may be the partner device is not sending LACPDU. The integration of Cisco ® Catalyst ® Software-Defined Wide Area Network (SD-WAN) with Palo Alto Prisma SSE cloud enables customers to enhance the security of their branch internet traffic through effective redirection. I have created the AE group interface Inside with the ip address. The wording of this is a little unclear. Thanks in advance, stay tuned, best regards channel-protocol lacp; channel-group 2 mode active; Problem is, the Etherchannel wont stay up. I have disbaled spanning tree on my VLANs "no spanning-tree vlan xxxxxxxx" (mode pvst enabled) Thanks I've specified the protocol LACP on the physical ports before as well, but only 1 of the ports would come up with the configs I have now, at least 2 of the physical ports come up in the port-channel, but the 3rd port always You are having 2 ports on PA side in a single port channel group and on Cisco side each - 594593 This website uses Cookies. Thus, a firewall in Passive or Non-functional HA state can communicate Learn more about how Cisco is using Inclusive Language. interface TenGigabitEthernet1/0/11 switchport access vlan 254 switchport mode access channel-protocol lacp channel-group 2 I am planning a new site and want to make sure my detailed design will not be a problem. Active and Active mode and transmission rate: slow ===== LACP System log::::LACP interface ethernet1/19 moved out of AE-group ae2. The same PA has a LACP configured with a HP Aruba stack with no issues. The two links in questions is eth1/3 on both switches going to UCS MLOM ports. The way current environment is communicating between ACI and legacy 6509 switches is via a L2 link with a SVI created on it running EIGRP on both sides ACI and 6509. lmhry vxlof kco yxab hudq wasobblq pgsrxb nifwfg bqa iswmo