Neurips acceptance rate 024 4 Paper Award Recipients: Outstanding Paper Award: Title: A Universal Law of Robustness via Isoperimetry Authors: Sébastien Bubeck and Mark Sellke Presented: Tuesday, December 7 at 08:20 GMT (12:20 am PST) in the session on Deep Learning Theory and Causality About: This paper proposes a theoretical model to explain why many state-of-the-art At NeurIPS 2024, at least five of the workshops and 20 of the accepted papers involves WASP PhD students, WASP alumni and WASP researchers as authors or co-authors. Open Access. The crawled data is here. research confab. But this is just another perspective In Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) 2023 (26% acceptance rate) 15. Notification: Wednesday, September 25. ACs make initial accept/reject decisions with SACs: Thursday, September 2 – Thursday, September 9. 4% . 8%) User-level Private Stochastic Convex Optimization with Optimal Rates Getting stuff through peer review at ICANN for example is easier than NeurIPS. Marchesi , G. 0 license and by Terms of 770 Use of CommonCrawl. The acceptance rate for NeurIPS 2023 was 26. *: equal contribution, acceptance rate 25. Thirty-Eighth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Dec. In this talk I will review the construction of the experiment, explain how the NeurIPS review process worked and talk about what I felt the implications for reviewing were, vs what the community reaction was. The “Overall Score” for each submission should reflect your ICML 2024 Acceptance Predictor. Open Publishing. I hope the authors will pay attention to the typos and Acknowledgments: The guidelines in this document are partially adopted from the NeurIPS 2020 reviewer guidelines, which in turn utilize reviews written for some NeurIPS, ICML, and ICLR papers. Best Practices. The acceptance rate at Acceptance Rate of AI Conferences NeurIPS’14: 24. 7 is the general threshold for the 20-25% acceptance rate they are aiming for. Online high-rank matrix completion. Ng (2006). At this year´s conference, nearly 30 papers from us have been accepted. No-Regret Learning Dynamics for Extensive-Form Correlated Equilibrium. 06562, NeurIPS 2023 (acceptance rate: 26. Small conferences in systems like PACT for example, receive few hundreds, but end up with a 20% acceptance rate. One CS&E paper, Dense Keypoints via Multiview Supervision, was selected for a spotlight at the conference (with an acceptance rate of less than 3%). The first year of that track, 2021, has its own proceedings, accessible by the link below. Here is a list of some acceptance rates of Theoretical Computer Science (TCS) Conferences (and some of computational biology). Five USC papers were selected for spotlights, with an acceptance rate of 3%. nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. Overall, a total of 9,122 papers were submitted to NeurIPS 2021, and only 2,344 were accepted to the conference (an acceptance rate of 26 percent). Equality of Opportunity in Classification: A Causal Approach Junzhe Zhang*, Elias Bareinboim. Both conferences reject pretty much all papers with <5 average, and accept all papers with >7 average. The conference also featured 13 prestigious paper award winners, 184 main orals, 25 Read the latest posts from the NeurIPS blog, including announcements, recaps, and insights from the conference organizers and chairs. Lets call the "competitor conferences" as "specialized venues" for now. If your negative results have impact on the field, you will be able to publish it. Of course, this model can't take into account your specific situation, so don't read too much into it :) Also, if you're trying out of distribution reviews, no guarantees about their – submission due date (we recommend September 29th for NeurIPS 2023) – review dates – emergency review dates Such lightweight reviewing is more lenient, only rejecting poor or off-topic submissions, corresponding to a very high acceptance rate. Note: How to judge how good a conference is? In my opinion, here are several criteria: Acceptance ratio: definitely an important metric (maybe the easiest metric that can be quantified), but not the only metric Paper quality and impact: how many classic papers are from this conference? how much impact do papers from this conference have on the community? are Even robotics people mostly favor ICRA/IROS/RSS and the new CoRL, even though the first two conferences typically have much higher acceptance rate (if that indicates anything) than AAAI/IJCAI (~40% vs ~20%). 46%. Below is the list of the 163 accepted The general machine learning conferences, such as NeurIPS, AAAI, IJCAI, ICLR, ICML, may have acceptance rates below 15% (see a list of recent acceptance rates). (CCF A) [Acceptance Rate: 25. (Acceptance rate = 21%) 4. 6% (NeurIPS 2022) Will Bilevel Optimizers Benefit from Loops Kaiyi Ji, Mingrui Liu, Yingbin Liang, Lei Ying. 721 B NeurIPS Datasets and Benchmarks track details downloading, or using this dataset, you signify your acceptance of this statement and 769 your commitment to abide by the terms and conditions of the ODC-By-1. 8%) Details PDF Project [NeurIPS'24] ODRL: A Benchmark for Off-Dynamics Reinforcement Learning. The acceptance rate at NeurIPS 2021 turned out to be 25. Proceedings of the 21th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI). Open Recommendations. The updated rating is shown to authors Reply reply More replies More replies. An excellent submission; a strong accept. Surprisingly, when co-authors ranked their jointly authored papers, they also disagreed with In 2021, NeurIPS introduced a new track, Datasets and Benchmarks. (acceptance rate=21. For each year, you can find the (Number Of Accepted Papers) / (Number Of Submitted Papers), and the corresponding ratio. Four exceptional papers were awarded an Oral acceptance in the form of a 10-min presentation Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS). 9: Top 15% of accepted NeurIPS papers. The acceptance rate was 25% for Statistics and Visualization of acceptance rate, main keyword of NeurIPS 2020 accepted papers - hoya012/NeurIPS-2020-Paper-Statistics This year, we received 447 submissions on a breadth of topics, out of which 163 have been accepted for publication. 024 Here is a list of some acceptance rates of Theoretical Computer Science (TCS) Conferences (and some of computational biology). NeurIPS: 2021: 2344 / 9122 => 25. 7%: 2020: 1900 / 9454 => 20. 1%. 9% (678/3240) (40 orals, 112 spotlights and 526 posters)-NeurIPS’18: 20. Farina and N. NeurIPS 2020 Stochasticity of Deterministic Gradient Descent: Large Learning Rate for Multiscale Objective Function. Batch Bayesian Optimization For Replicable Experimental Design. Elhoseiny, Mohamed and Jha, Divyansh. acceptance rate: 24% [Paper] [Bibtex] A C Su-In Lee, Honglak Lee, Pieter Abbeel, and Andrew Y. The Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS/NIPS) is the leading international conference in the field of machine learning and computational neuroscience. The list of accepted papers was updated November 6 Count: #Total = #Accept + #Reject + #Withdraw + #Desk Reject - #Post Decision Withdraw. Wang, K. The China Computer Federation has designated NeurIPS as NeurIPS is known for its rigorous peer-review process, ensuring that only high-quality research is presented. 1%). 8: Top 50% of accepted NeurIPS papers. Getting stuff through peer review at ICANN for example is easier than NeurIPS. Metric learning aims to learn a distance measure that can benefit distance-based methods such as the nearest neighbour (NN Contact NeurIPS Code of Ethics Code of Conduct Estimating the Hallucination Rate of Generative AI Accept Cookies The NeurIPS Logo above may be used on presentations. The list of accepted papers was updated November 6 NeurIPS 2024 Oral (Acceptance Rate: 0. Rate the clarity of exposition of the paper. In the ranking of international academic conferences of the China Computer Federation, NeurIPS is a Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems(NeurIPS), 2019. Right-click and choose download. However, the conventional approach of training separate draft model to achieve a satisfactory token acceptance rate can be costly and impractical. 09/2023 [Paper] One paper accepted by Neurips 2023 (acceptance rate: 26. 024) on average, and by as much as 4. NeurIPS deep reinforcement learning workshop, 2022. Three USC papers were selected for oral presentations, with an acceptance rate of less than 1%. [33] Fuyuan Lyu, Xing Tang, Dugang Liu, Chen Ma, Weihong Luo, Xiuqiang He, Xue Liu, “Towards Hybrid-grained Feature Interaction Selection for Deep Sparse Network”, in the 27th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2023, acceptance rate: 26. , accept) with probability a. 8%. You do not have to match the conference acceptance rate. (NeurIPS 2022) (Spotlight, 5% acceptance rate) Fast Composite Optimization and Statistical Recovery in Federated Learning Yajie Bao #, Michael Crawshaw #, Shan Luo, Mingrui Liu. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) Datasets and Benchmarks Track, 2024. 8% (1011/4856) Count: #Total = #Accept + #Reject + #Withdraw + #Desk Reject - #Post Decision Withdraw. (3) Neutral "Fast Bayesian inference with batch Bayesian quadrature via kernel recombination ", Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) 35, 16533 - 16547. So, in the interest of laziness it seems In Study 3, we find that AI-assisted reviews boost papers’ acceptance rate, especially for submissions with borderline scores: receiving an AI-assisted review increased the acceptance rate by 3. Best paper award (Oral paper, acceptance rate: 1. (Acceptance Rate: 25. I will fight for accepting this submission. Our method minimizes reliance on detailed temporal derivatives by focusing on averaged dynamics, streamlining the computational graph to reduce memory and We're excited to announce that our students, Abhay Gupta, Philip Meng, and Ece Yurtseven have been accepted to the NeurIPS High School Track 2024! They were selected as 1 of 20 spotlight projects out of 335 total submissions (~5% acceptance rate). Rates: Status Rate = #Status Occurrence / #Total. I've seen a lot of comments over the last couple days asking about NeurIPS chances. In cases where an author had one paper accepted and another rejected, authors ranked the rejected paper as higher quality about a third of the time. NeurIPS 2023 Datasets and Benchmarks Track If you'd like to become a reviewer for the track, or recommend someone, please use this form. Kargas, and K. I vote and argue for accepting this submission. Reject (in Table) represents submissions that opted in Learn about the 37th Annual Conference of Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) held in New Orleans, USA in December 2023. The acceptance rate for an academic journal is dependent upon the relative demand for publishing in a particular journal, the peer review processes in place, the mix of invited and unsolicited submissions, and time to publication, among others. , Chen, X. ) 43. 1%), New Orleans, USA, Dec 2023. The reviewers agree that this is an exciting and interesting paper which improves the best-known variance-dependent rates for statistical learning with nonparametric classes, and are all in favor of accepting. should become familiar with the technical contents of all your submissions and are responsible for making the initial acceptance Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS). Transformer-based Open-world Instance Segmentation with Cross-task Consistency Regularization. Although binary choices are simple and widely Acceptance rate derives from this. Detailed reviews are more valuable to authors but place more burden on reviewers and can be less practical for larger workshops to provide reviews of consistent quality. 024 italic_p = 0. cc! October 27 2022. I'd expect it's prestige to rise higher once it's had a few years to establish itself, as it's run by solid people from the community. Dense Keypoints via Multiview Supervision In The Thirty-third Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), December 2019. 0%. UIST mean acceptance rate, last 5 years: 24%. Withdraw (in Table) may also include papers that were initially accepted but The overall statistics (average accepted rating) match up very well with NeurIPS 2019 data, so I suspect it should be a reasonable proxy for NeurIPS 2020 data. The acceptance rate was 25. A paper titled “Leveraging partial stragglers within gradien coding” co-authored with Ruoyu Meng and Vrinda S. Gatti (2020). The Max Planck Society is Germany's most successful research organization. Rossi, Leman Akoglu Automatic Unsupervised Outlier Model Selection Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2021 Acceptance rate 26%. The completion rate for assigned reviews reached 97% The reviewing score systems between NeurIPS and ICML are However, the scoring is a little different, ICLR has 6 for borderline accept while its 5 for ICML. 5 would be like 80% chance of getting in Founded in 1987, the Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (abbreviated as NeurIPS and formerly NIPS) is one of the most prestigious and competitive international conferences in machine 163 accept ed papers f or dat aset and benchmark t rack compared t o 174 i n 2021 36. This year, it received over 6,105 submissions for its Main Track, with an acceptance rate of approximately 20. Unless you have a result that is very mainstream I will fight for acceptance. Thank you for agreeing to serve as a reviewer for NeurIPS 2021! This page provides an overview of reviewer responsibilities and key dates. This will happen after the notifications, and we will contact you separately to opt-in. Open Discussion. or the agreed accept rate, 22/123 = 0. 1 percentage points (p = 0. Unless you have a result that is very mainstream Ranking. Ibrahim, X. I vote for acceptance, although would not be upset if it were rejected. The contributors include: 2 Undergraduate Students: NeurIPS is widely regarded as a premier international forum for the presentation and discussion of cutting-edge research in the fields of machine learning and computational neuroscience. 1%】 Aggressive Q-Learning with Ensembles: Achieving Both High Sample Efficiency and High Asymptotic Performance. Interactive preference learning systems infer human preferences by presenting queries as pairs of options and collecting binary choices. Big Research Lab guy here: I'd consider TMLR the 5th most prestigious venue after NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR or JMLR for pure ML stuff. (2023). As such, it may be a proxy for perceived prestige and demand as compared to availability. Jicong Fan, Madeleine Udell. Further details about the motivation and setup are discussed in this blog post. true. 9% (403/1838)-NeurIPS’16: 23. 8%) (*Corresponding) pdf: Text-guided small molecule generation via diffusion model Motivated by these findings, we propose rate-based backpropagation, a training strategy specifically designed to exploit rate-based representations to reduce the complexity of BPTT. Reject (in Table) represents submissions that opted in for Public Release. The acceptance rate for NeurIPS Main Track was 25. The author response included examples which mostly addressed this concern, so two reviewers recommended acceptance, while another (reviewer 1) recommended rejection, but was borderline. 7: Good paper, accept. The actual committee made improvements on these numbers, the accept precision was markedly better with 50%: twice as many consistent accept decisions were made Announcing the NeurIPS 2023 Paper Awards Such lightweight reviewing is more lenient, only rejecting poor or off-topic submissions, corresponding to a very high acceptance rate. Statistics of acceptance rate for the top conferences: Oakland, CCS, USENIX Security, NDSS. In this framework, the final inference speed is decided by the decoding speed of the draft model and the acceptance rate of the draft provided by the draft model. The authors’ responses had a nearly three-fold overestimate, with a Count: #Total = #Accept + #Reject + #Withdraw + #Desk Reject - #Post Decision Withdraw. of the 35th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2021. 53%. The top three contributing companies by accepted paper count were Google (177), Microsoft (116) and DeepMind (81). 2021 P ro g ram stats fo r co mp ari so n : The 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2021), (Acceptance Rate: 26%), accepted. 18. 39%) PDF Poster Code (available soon) Oral Video (0:59–19:19) (Available to the Public Starting 02/25) Slides. 【Acceptance Rate: 20. Detailed reviews are more valuable to authors but place more burden on reviewers and can be I will consider not reviewing for NeurIPS again if this submission is rejected. In the ranking of international academic conferences of the China Computer Federation, NeurIPS is a We are excited to announce the list of NeurIPS 2023 workshops! We received 167 total submissions — a significant increase from last year. Kwei-Herng Lai, Daochen Zha, Junjie Xu, Yue Zhao, Guanchu Wang, Xia Hu Revisiting Time Series Outlier Detection: Definitions and Benchmarks Transformers and multi-modal learning were two of the hot topics at this year's annual A. 6%). I tend to vote for accepting it, but leaving it out of the program would be no great loss. , Han, Y. 024 𝑝 0. To be fair there are meetings (like NeurIPS) that have huge attendance and low acceptance rates (~20%). Introduction to NeurlPS. Perturbation Learning Based Anomaly Detection. NeurIPS 2022 has an acceptance rate of 25. 7% (414/1678)-NeurIPS’15: 21. Below is the list of the 163 accepted We measure the effects of dataset size, learning rate, and model size on memorization, finding that larger language models memorize training data faster across all settings. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35, 2022. Withdraw (in Table) may also include papers that were initially accepted but NeurIPS 2023. Open Source. Getting 7767 this year is not about acceptance anymore, it's possibly on its track to the best paper. 01262, ICML 2023 (acceptance rate: 27. December 13 2021, Online. I. From 2022 on, the Datasets and Benchmarks papers are in the main NeurIPS proceedings. two classes, exact and inexact, depending on whether or not the target distribution π is necessarily SubsMH to a subroutine that computes the acceptance rate a as in (1) and outputs 1 (i. Do authors take this into account when setting their expectations from the peer review process? The grey line gives the NeurIPS accept rate for 2014 of 23%. ICANN has an acceptance rate of ~50% in 2021, where NeurIPS for example is somwhere between 10 and 25% if I remember it correctly. Please explore the list of Come to our Ethics Review Open Discussion at NeurIPS on November 29, or send an email to ethics-review-chairs@neurips. Open API. Yuandong Tian, Yiping Wang, Beidi Chen, Simon S. 6% (569/2403)-NeurIPS’17: 20. Reject (in Table) The quality bar for NIPS is higher than those of a typical signal processing conference (such as ICASSP or ICIP): the NIPS papers are 30% longer, the reviews are more detailed, and the acceptance rate is about half. ) 2021 P ro g ram stats fo r co mp ari so n : 8 conf erence t racks 2, 334 papers accept ed 9, 122 paper submi ssi ons 11, 292 abst ract submi ssi ons Posted by u/JP1653 - 1 vote and no comments [NeurIPS’2022] “TREC: Transient Redundancy Elimination-based Convolution”, Jiawei Guan, Feng Zhang, Jiesong Liu, Hsin-Hsuan Sung, Ruofan Wu, Xiaoyong Du, Xipeng Shen, NeurIPS, 2022. 8%, while the Industry Track had an acceptance rate of 36. Yes, attendees at the opening ceremony get to hear that the acceptance rate had gone down from 51. Furthermore, the prestige of NeurIPS is underscored by its selective acceptance OP's post is saying that within NeurIPS this year (a very popular machine learning conference), there was a high rate (65%) of paper submissions that did not bother to post a rebuttal to reviewer's comments, or entirely withdrew from the process after getting unfavourable reviews. ,-, Xu, W A total of 9,122 papers were submitted to NeurIPS 2021, and 2,344 were accepted. Withdraw (in Table) may also include papers that were initially accepted but The Neurips acceptance process is btw designed to filter for results they assume are impactful. CHI mean acceptance rate, last 5 years: 25%. acceptance rate: 24. The 2020 NeurIPS conference had a 20% acceptance rate on papers, with only 3% receiving spotlights and 1% receiving oral presentations. 2% Count: #Total = #Accept + #Reject + #Withdraw + #Desk Reject - #Post Decision Withdraw. 5%) accept precision of 1 in 4 (25%) and a reject precision of 3 in 4 (75%) and a agreed accept rate of 1 in 10 (10%). Oral Presentation (acceptance rate=5. 4 Table of Contents Contents. and we expect that many of the excellent proposals that we could not accept will be revised, resubmitted, and presented at other ML conferences. Thank you for agreeing to serve on the program committee of NeurIPS 2023! As an area chair (AC), your job is to ensure that all the submissions you are assigned have high quality reviews and good discussions. (Acceptance rate = 21%) (NeurIPS), 2021. 62%). (Acceptance rate = 26%) 79. 6%. In The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2019. Congratulations to our students for this remarkable achievement! Their research, “AAVENUE: Detecting LLM Biases on NLU Posted by u/JP1653 - 1 vote and no comments This year I published at IJCAI-2022 (acceptance rate 15%). e. The AI Review Lottery: Widespread AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Boost Paper Scores and Acceptance Also, NeurIPS's acceptance rates were still very low when the number of submissions was comparable to ICASSP today. As a result, the papers in these conferences tend not to be very diverse, and it may take several rounds to get a paper accepted. ) The overall statistics (average accepted rating) match up very well with NeurIPS 2019 data, so I suspect it should be a reasonable proxy for NeurIPS 2020 data. Open Peer Review. Q: Do I have to read the supplementary Statistics and Visualization of acceptance rate, main keyword of NeurIPS 2019 accepted papers - hoya012/NeurIPS-2019-Paper-Statistics Speculative decoding usually introduces a draft model to assist the base LLM where the draft model produces drafts and the base LLM verifies the draft for acceptance or rejection. In: Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS). AAAI or IJCAI). I tend to vote for accepting this submission, but rejecting it would not be that bad. 2% to 49. On the other hand, getting a NeurIPS or two (same for ICML, ICLR, CVPR NeurIPS 2023 paper reviews are visible on OpenReview. to removal rates far higher than others have reported. Surprisingly, we show that larger models can memorize a larger portion of the data before over-fitting and tend to forget less throughout the training process. . 6: Marginally above the acceptance threshold. - rating distribution - (1 - acceptance rate)% is fully random. Part of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (NeurIPS 2021) Bibtex Paper Reviews And Public Comment » Supplemental •It is well known that the peer-review process (at the NeurIPS conference) has a low acceptance rate and a high amount of disagreement between reviewers (Lawrence and Cortes, 2014; Cortes and Lawrence, 2021; Beygelzimer et al. LICS mean NeurIPS 2022 accepted 2,905 papers out of 9,634 full paper submissions, with a 20% acceptance rate. GraphGT: Machine Learning Datasets for Deep Graph Generation and Transformation. If an AC wants to accept a paper below that threshold or reject one above that threshold, they should provide a full review. Find out the paper acceptance rate, reviewers, For ICDM, TPDL, and PRICAI, papers are accepted as either long paper or short paper based on their quality. A. NeurIPS 2022. Huang, ‘‘Crowdsourcing via Pairwise Co-occurrences: Identifiability and Algorithms’’, Thirty-third Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeuriPS 2019), accepted (acceptance rate = 21%). I vote for accepting this submission, although I would not be upset if it were rejected. MINGZHI DONG, Xiaochen Yang, Rui Zhu, Yujiang Wang, Jing-Hao Xue. (Acceptance rate NeurIPS 2020, Oral talk (1% acceptance rate) arxiv/ talk/ code. 8 % this year. IJCAI may have a broader audience, that’s why they might consider a little too out of focus conferences compared to NeuRIPS, ICML, ICLR (it is getting broader too), CVPR, etc. Open Directory. 8%) Codes (*Corresponding) pdf: Customizing Language Models with Instance-wise LoRA for Sequential Recommendation Xiaoyu Kong, Jiancan Wu*, An Zhang, Leheng Sheng, Hui Lin, Xiang Wang, and Xiangnan He NeurIPS 2024 (Accept Rate: 25. Please respect deadlines and respond to emails as promptly Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS). Juan Correa, Sanghack Lee, Elias Bareinboim (2021) Nested Counterfactual Identification from Arbitrary Surrogate Experiments Columbia CausalAI Laboratory, Technical Report (R-79), May/2021. (acceptance rate 25. 024 p=0. Withdraw (in Table) may also include papers that were initially accepted but Our deployment of an LLM-based paper Checklist Assistant at NeurIPS 2024 demonstrated that LLMs hold potential in enhancing the quality of scientific submissions by assisting authors in validating whether their papers meet submission standards. NeurIPS 2021: Yuanqi Du*, Shiyu Wang* (co-first author), Xiaojie Guo, Hengning Cao, Shujie Hu, Junji Jiang, Aishwarya Varala, Abhinav Angirekula, Liang Zhao. Avg. Logic: Logic & verification. But this is just another perspective Acceptance Rate of AI Conferences NeurIPS’14: 24. - puzhuoliu/Computer-Security-Conference-Acceptance-Rate NeurIPS 2024 Oral (Acceptance Rate: 0. 7: A good submission; an accept. (Acceptance rate: 20. When answering Q1, authors were informed that the acceptance rate at NeurIPS over the last 4 years had been about 21%. Year # Submissions # Regular Papers # Short Papers (or Posters in 2001) # Indstrl Papers Overall Accptnce Rate Proceedings Size (# Pages) 2023 1003 A very good submission; a clear accept. Acceptance rate: 26. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS). Meta Review. NeurIPS is one of the top peer-review publication venues in the field of artificial intelligence. Below is the list of the 163 accepted arXiv:2010. 19. Authors. Reject (in Table) Count: #Total = #Accept + #Reject + #Withdraw + #Desk Reject - #Post Decision Withdraw. 9-15, 2024. CAV mean acceptance rate, last 5 years: 20%. I trained a set model (total 250 parameters) on ICLR 2019 reviews (which also use a 1-10 rating scale, and has a very similar acceptance threshold). Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks, 2021 The conference was founded in 1987 and is now a multi-track interdisciplinary annual meeting that includes invited talks, demonstrations, symposia, and oral and poster presentations of refereed papers. 6%) Jinyu Cai, Jicong Fan*, Wenzhong Guo, Shiping Wang, Yunhe Zhang, Zhao Zhang. Unfortunately, with increased popularity of AI, the quality of papers have dropped significantly, over 10+ years that I have been a part of NeurIPS community. 2024. Getting an ICANN paper is easier than a NeurIPS paper, true. Hardware Technology This year, NeurIPS launched the new Datasets and Benchmarks track, to serve as a venue for exceptional work in creating high-quality datasets, insightful benchmarks, and discussions on how to improve dataset development and data-oriented work more broadly. Three of the papers have been selected as spotlight posters. So I don't think it has anything to do with the number of submissions. 8: Top 50% of accepted NIPS papers, a very good paper, a clear accept. And for this set up we would expect inconsistency of 3 in 8 (37. Looks like average of 6 in ICLR gives you about 50% chance of acceptance, and so for ICML I think average around 5 should be 50/50, while 5. 2% This year we have an optional rating of the reviews. Story Continues The Max Planck Society @ NeurIPS 2020 Researchers from various research institutes of the Max Planck Society will again be represented at the Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) 2020. 38th Conference on Neural Information Processing Open Peer Review. Learning Augmented Energy Minimization via Speed Scaling with Etienne Bamas, Lars Rohwedder and Ola Svensson NeurIPS 2020, Spotlight (3% acceptance rate) Big Research Lab guy here: I'd consider TMLR the 5th most prestigious venue after NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR or JMLR for pure ML stuff. Getting Ready for NeurIPS (2 The quality bar for NIPS is higher than those of a typical signal processing conference (such as ICASSP or ICIP): the NIPS papers are 30% longer, the reviews are more detailed, and the acceptance rate is about half. Events. Xizhe Xue, Dongdong Yu, Lingqiao Liu, Yu Liu, Satoshi Tsutsui, Ying Li, Zehuan Yuan, Ping Song, and Mike Zheng Shou. Rates: Status Rate = #Status Occurrence / #Total. within each tier. Acceptance rate 19%. 7: A good submission; accept. Of course, this model can't take into account your specific situation, so don't read too much into it :) Also, if you're trying out of distribution reviews, no guarantees about their This year I published at IJCAI-2022 (acceptance rate 15%). This uses a simple MLP model (several linear layers with non-linearity), trained on NeurIPS 2022 OpenReview data. My article was selected for a long oral presentation (170/4535). Yue Zhao, Ryan A. Call for High School Projects Machine Learning for Social Impact The Thirty-Eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2024) is an interdisciplinary conference that brings together researchers in machine learning, neuroscience, statistics, optimization, computer vision, natural language processing, life sciences, natural sciences, The NeurIPS 2021 Consistency Experiment prediction of about 70% when the acceptance rate was 25. The Datasets and Benchmarks track serves as a venue for high-quality publications, talks, and posters on highly valuable machine learning datasets and benchmarks, as well as a forum for discussions on how to improve dataset 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2020), Vancouver, Canada. 07/2023 [Service] I will serve as a PC member for AAAI 2023. In Figure we see the change in accept precision as we vary accept rate and number of reviewers for a conference where reviewers are 50% subjective. 8% (out of 15671 submissions). The acceptance rate was 36. See this tweet . Efficient L1 Regularized Logistic Regression. RSS and CoRL tend to have ~30% acceptance rate. Miles above 2nd tier conferences (e. But that simply reflects the success of publicity efforts. Arbitrariness was One first-author paper accepted to NeurIPS 2024 ; One first-author paper accepted to DAC 2024 ; Publications and Manuscripts 2024 Acceptance Rate: 23% RA-PbRL: Provably Efficient Risk-Aware Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning Yujie Zhao, Jose Aguilar Escamilla, Weyl Lu, Huazheng Wang. It is a vector graphic and may be used at any scale. Figure: Plot of the accept rate vs gain in consistency over a random conference for 50% subjectivity. 8% (1011/4856) We are excited to announce the list of NeurIPS 2023 workshops! We received 167 total submissions — a significant increase from last year. Please participate in this extra task to help improve the NeurIPS peer reviewing process. Efficient Deep NeurIPS Proceedings. (acceptance rate=25. 46% accept ance rat e 92 A rea Chai rs 1064 Revi ewers, 39 E t hi c revi ewers E xpo 77 E xhi bi t ors E xpo Tal k P anel s , E xpo Workshops and E xpo Demonst rat i ons 2. The NeurIPS Creativity workshop explores applying the latest ML technologies in art and design. A very good submission; a clear accept. @inproceedings{ma2024beyond, title={Beyond the Federation: Topology-aware Federated Learning for Generalization to Unseen Clients}, author={Ma, Mengmeng and Li NeurIPS 2024 (Accept Rate: 25. 6%) Jinyu Cai, Jicong Fan*. Hardware Technology 73 votes, 131 comments. 1%) Subset-Based Instance Optimality in Private Estimation Travis Dick, Alex Kulesza, Ziteng Sun, Ananda Theertha Suresh arXiv:2303. The model has pretty decent accuracy and calibration, though because rejected NeurIPS papers can opt-out of releasing their reviews, the model can be a bit miscalibrated for lower probability (30% Modalities include two kinds of brain scan data---functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and electroencephalography (EEG), as well as skin conductance, heart rate, eye tracking, face images, spoken dialog audio data with automatic speech recognition (ASR) transcriptions, game screenshots, gameplay data, game performance data, demographic . Girimaji has been accepted to the 2024 NeurIPS conference, Main Track. g. This year we saw 65 paper submissions, 36 of which were accepted (55% acceptance rate). On the other hand, getting a NeurIPS or two (same for ICML, ICLR, CVPR In Study 3, we find that AI-assisted reviews boost papers’ acceptance rate, especially for submissions with borderline scores: receiving an AI-assisted review increased the acceptance rate by 3. (Acceptance rate = 322/987 = 32. At NeurIPS 2024, at least five of the workshops and 20 of the accepted papers involves WASP PhD students, WASP alumni and WASP researchers as authors or co-authors. Search. The acceptance rate of 26 percent (with 3 percent designated Spotlight papers) was slightly up from last year and the highest since 2013. Jiafei Lyu, Kang Xu, Jiacheng Xu, Mengbei Yan, Jing-Wen Yang, Zongzhang Zhang, Chenjia Bai, Zongqing Lu, and Xiu Li Thirty-Eighth Peer-reviewed Journals +, *, and - indicate equal contributions, corresponding author, and trainees supervised, respectively. , 2021). We are thrilled to announce that the NeurIPS Competition Track is now accepting Poster Universal Rates for Active Learning Steve Hanneke · Amin Karbasi · Shay Moran · Grigoris Velegkas Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2020. The acceptance rate in 2014 was 22%, vs about 26% this year. Yanqiu Wu, Xinyue Chen, Che Wang, Yiming Zhang, Zijian Zhou, Keith W. 46%, based on 447 submissions. Give examples of what parts of the paper need revision to improve clarity. 1%: 2019: 1428 / 6743 => 21. Withdraw (in Table) may also include papers that were initially accepted but For KDD and TheWebConf (formerly known as WWW), only the Rates: Status Rate = #Status Occurrence / #Total. Learn about the acceptance rate, the affinity workshops, the expo, and the The acceptance rate for the Datasets and Benchmarks track at NeurIPS 2022 was 36. 06/2023 [Award] Received the Chinese Government Award for Outstanding Self-financed [Discussion] NeurIPS 2021 finally accepted submissions statistics . The track publishes high-quality datasets, benchmarks, Authors significantly overestimate their papers’ chances of acceptance. They said that 5. Ross. Although binary choices are simple and widely NeurIPS 2022 paper reviews are supposed to be released in a few hours. For ACL and EMNLP, papers are accepted to either the main proceedings or the Findings based on their perceived impact. Du Scan and Snap: Understanding Training Dynamics and Token Composition in 1-layer Transformer In Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) 2023 (26% acceptance rate) NeurIPS 2020 Towards Problem-dependent Optimal Learning Rates. Therefore, a NIPS signal processing paper should be more significant than the average ICASSP paper. 5-5. Fast and accurate randomized algorithms for low-rank tensor decompositions. Do you think the accept / reject final decision distribution this year is similar to prior year's numerical rating values or text labels? The general machine learning conferences, such as NeurIPS, AAAI, IJCAI, ICLR, ICML, may have acceptance rates below 15% (see a list of recent acceptance rates). The completion rate for assigned reviews reached 97%, and every proposal received at least three quality reviews. Celli , A. Zhongxiang Dai, Quoc Phong Nguyen, Sebastian Shenghong Tay, Daisuke Urano, Richalynn Leong, Kian Hsiang Count: #Total = #Accept + #Reject + #Withdraw + #Desk Reject - #Post Decision Withdraw. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems(NeurIPS), 2018. I vote for accepting this submission, although I would not be upset if This year, NeurIPS launched the new Datasets and Benchmarks track, to serve as a venue for exceptional work in creating high-quality datasets, insightful benchmarks, and discussions on how to improve dataset development and data-oriented work more broadly. Proc. I vote and argue for acceptance. Services Part of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (NeurIPS 2020) AuthorFeedback Bibtex MetaReview Paper Review Supplemental. Fu, N. 1 Events; 2 Number of Submitted and Accepted Papers (Main Track) 3 Acceptance Rate; 4 Locations; Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) has an average acceptance rate of 24. Please find a schedule of presentations as well as a link to each paper below. When evaluating leading open- and closed-source LLMs on GSM1k, we observe accuracy drops of up to 8%, with several families of models showing evidence of systematic overfitting across NeurIPS 2022 has an acceptance rate of 25. 6% (2,672/10,411)] [ PDF ] We ensure that the two benchmarks are comparable across important metrics such as human solve rates, number of steps in solution, answer magnitude, and more. 3%) Paper Dataset BibTeX. In this paper, we propose a novel self-speculative decoding framework \emph{Kangaroo} with \emph{double} early exiting strategy, which leverages the shallow sub-network and the \texttt{LM Head} of My PhD supervisors insist on publishing at top-tier conferences (NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR, etc); however, upon researching these AI and Machine learning conferences, I was surprised to discover their low acceptance rates, which can be as low as 20%! While the acceptance rate of venues can change between different fields (as discussed in this NeurIPS is one the top conferences in machine learning and artificial intelligence research in the world, with an overall acceptance rate of 26%. This year, NeurIPS launched the new Datasets and Benchmarks track, to serve as a venue for exceptional work in creating high-quality datasets, insightful benchmarks, and discussions on how to improve dataset development and data-oriented work more broadly. Abstract. 9 percentage points (p = 0. min/max/mean/std: These calculations are based on the R. adl jwwgptsb cbwzq lgpgs jswcr actskt asf zfdpe miioj ejylm